Home

Gpl v3 copyleft

Die GNU General Public License - die Allgemeine Öffentliche GNU-Lizenz - ist eine freie Copyleft-Lizenz für Software und andere Arten von Werken. Die meisten Lizenzen für Software und andere nutzbaren Werke sind daraufhin entworfen worden, Ihnen die Freiheit zu nehmen, die Werke mit anderen zu teilen und zu verändern Version 3 of the Lesser GPL is built as an exception added to GPL version 3, making the compatibility automatic. If you would like to copyleft your program with the GNU GPL or the GNU LGPL, please see the license instructions page for advice. Please note that you must use the entire text of the license you choose Taken all together, LGPLv3 § 4's primary implications for redistributors are two-fold, as follows: If you create a program that links through a shared library mechanism to a work that is separately distributed under LGPLv3, then you can distribute the resultant program under a license of your choice and you need not convey the LGPLv3'd work's source code Copyleft-Lizenzen: Fontana arbeitet an GPLv3-Nachfolger. Der Mitautor der GPLv3 arbeitet an einer nächsten Version. Sie soll kompatibel zu allen bisherigen GPL-Lizenzen, leichter zu verstehen und. Nutzung. Die GPL kann von jedem als Lizenz verwendet werden, um mit dieser die Freiheitsrechte der Endnutzer sicherzustellen. Sie ist die erste Copyleft-Lizenz für den allgemeinen Gebrauch.Copyleft bedeutet, dass Änderungen oder Ableitungen von GPL-lizenzierten Werken nur unter den gleichen Lizenzbedingungen (also eben GPL) vertrieben werden dürfen

Der Copyleft - Effekt (Ziffer 2 b GPL) besagt, dass Bearbeitungen der Software (deriative Work) nur unter der Ursprungslizenz weitergegeben oder veröffentlicht (distribute or publish) werden dürfen. Der Copyleft-Effekt kann unterschiedlich streng ausgestaltet sein Juni 2007 behält die grundsätzliche Intention der GPLv2 und ist eine Open Source-Lizenz mit einem strengen Copyleft So enthält die neue Lizenzversion eine Reihe von Klauseln zu Fragen, die in der Version 2 der GPL noch nicht oder nur unzureichend berücksichtigt wurden. Die wichtigsten Neuregelungen sind: a) Die GPLv3 enthält Kompatibilitätsregelungen, die es einfacher als bislang.

GPL is the acronym for GNU's General Public License, and it's one of the most popular open source licenses. Richard Stallman created the GPL to protect the GNU software from being made proprietary. It is a specific implementation of his copyleft concept 7.3 GPLv2 § 6: GPL, My One and Only 7.4 GPLv2 Irrevocability 7.5 GPLv2 § 7: Give Software Liberty or Give It Death! 7.6 GPLv2 § 8: Excluding Problematic Jurisdictions 8 Odds, Ends, and Absolutely No Warranty 8.1 GPLv2 § 9: FSF as Stewards of GPL 8.2 GPLv2 § 10: Relicensing Permitted 8.3 GPLv2 § 11: No Warrant

Open Source—Avoiding Common Pitfalls

GPL v3 - GNU.d

Die GNU Affero General Public License (AGPL) ist eine Lizenz für freie Software mit Copyleft, bei der die Nutzer der Software eine Downloadmöglichkeit für den Quelltext selbst dann erhalten müssen, wenn die Software nur auf einem Server als Dienst betrieben, also nicht direkt zum Download angeboten wird GPLv3 of June 29, 2007 contains the basic intent of GPLv2 and is an Open Source license with a strict copyleft (→ What types of licenses are there for Open Source software, and how do they differ Is the copyright mentioned in GPL v3 used just for the sake of defining the word? (It's not copyrighted, but the word encompasses the same actions that would violate the copyright if it was copyrighted.) To propagate a work means to do anything with it that, without permission, would make you directly or secondarily liable for infringement under applicable copyright law, except executing.

The GPL series are all copyleft licenses, which means that any derivative work must be distributed under the same or equivalent license terms. This is in distinction to permissive software licenses, of which the BSD licenses and the MIT License are widely used, less restrictive examples. GPL was the first copyleft license for general use Wenn Sie sichergehen wollen, daß von Ihnen geplante Aktivitäten im Sinne der GNU GPL gestattet sind, halten Sie sich bitte an die englischsprachige Originalversion. Die Übersetzer und die Free Software Foundation möchten Sie darum bitten, diese Übersetzung nicht als offizielle Lizenzbedingungen für von Ihnen geschriebene Programme zu verwenden GPL v3 tries to close some loopholes in GPL v2. Specifically If you distribute this library in an executable, you must disclose your source code by providing it either alongside your distribution or list an accessible way (URL, physical copy) to obtain the source for 3 years

GNU AGPL — Copyleft für das Web 2.0. Von Stefan Meretz 10. Juli 2007 Eigentumsfragen, Freie Software 12 Kommentare. Die neue Version 3 der GNU General Public License (GNU GPL) löst viele aktuelle Anforderungen an den Schutz der Freiheit der Nutzer_innen und Entwickler_innen Freier Software. Zwar meint (mal wieder) Microsoft, dass die GPL V3 für sie nicht gelte, auch wenn sie nach dem Deal. Unterschied zu GPL: Im Gegensatz zur GPL V3 ist bei der CC BY mangels Copyleft-Effekt nicht erforderlich, dass die abgewandelte Version auch unter CC BY lizenziert wird. nach oben. 5. Was bedeutet der Begriff proprietäre Software? In der Literatur wird als Gegenbegriff zu Open Source Software der Begriff der proprietären Software verwendet. Proprietäre Software bezeichnet nach der FSF.

What is Copyleft? - GNU Project - Free Software Foundatio

Die GPL v3 bezieht sich nur auf Software, die klassisch an die Nutzer verteilt wird. Sie bezieht sich nicht auf Software, die nur auf Ihrem Server läuft. Daher sind die Nutzer keine Lizenznehmer. Eine Herausgabe des Quelltextes ist also nicht erforderlich. Natürlich dürfen Sie Gebühren für Ihren Dienst verlangen. Die GPL v2 kennt eigentlich keine Cloud- oder Webdienste. Sie spricht nur. The GNU Affero General Public License version 3 (AGPLv3) is a copyleft license nearly identical to the GPLv3. Both licenses have the same copyleft scope, but materially differ in one important way. The AGPLv3's Section 13 states an additional condition not present in GPLv2 or GPLv3 GPL compatible: Yes: Copyleft: Yes: Linking from code with a different licence: Yes: Website: www.gnu.org /copyleft /lesser.html: The GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) is a free-software license published by the Free Software Foundation (FSF). The license allows developers and companies to use and integrate a software component released under the LGPL into their own (even proprietary. If the copyleft effect is to be extended to ASP use (→ When does independently developed software have to be licensed under the GPL?), the Affero General Public License, Version 3 (AGPL) must be applied that only differs from the GPLv3 in this regard

b) Accompany the Combined Work with a copy of the GNU GPL and this license document. c) For a Combined Work that displays copyright notices during execution, include the copyright notice for the Library among these notices, as well as a reference directing the user to the copies of the GNU GPL and this license document. d) Do one of the following The GPL Copyleft License . The GPL is a copyleft, or viral license. This means that if your work is based on, or derivative of, a GPL component, and you distribute your work, it must be made available subject to the GPL. This includes your obligation to release its source code, as well as granting recipients the GPL rights to modify and distribute the entire code. The source code that you.

GPL, also known as copyleft, grants permission to reuse or modify the source code to make derivative works, but if you distribute your program to others, it requires you to license your derivative work under the GPL too. E.g. you have to make the. Differences between GPL and LGPL when using licensed software. Aug. 31, 2018, 11:29 a.m. By Marek Olejnik. Software licensed with any GNU license can be used and modified everywhere, without any restrictions in private and even in corporate environments

11 LGPLv3 - Copyleft

  1. Cs go face it . Dort wurde merkur magie online echtgeld als uhu prämiert, mit dem Schellen-Ass den vorletzten Stich zu machen
  2. OSS - GPL v3 plugins in non-copyleft codebase. Ask Question Asked 7 years, 9 months ago. Active 7 years, 8 months ago. Viewed 151 times 1. I've been working on software to modify a game's resource files, and I'm planning on releasing it in open source. I'm perfectly fine with releasing my code under gpl v3. However, I'm afraid that that would deter others from writing extensions for my.
  3. of the GPL coined the term copyleft to describe its license bar-gain. It is both a play on the word copyright and an acknowl-edgment that it promoted a radical (i.e., left-wing, perhaps) departure from traditional software licensing models. The role of a copyleft software license is to grow the public commons of software rather than allow each owner's copyright to pull from that commons. The.

Copyleft-Effekte und GPL. Die LGPL unterscheidet sich von der GPL in der Weise, dass der strenge Copyleft - also die Verpflichtung, Ableitungen (derivative works) wiederum unter dieselben Lizenzbedingungen zu stellen - beim Linken oder sonstigen speziellen Zugriffen auf die Bibliothek gelockert wurde. Zwar betonen die Autoren der Lizenz, dass die GPL in ihren Augen aufgrund des. The question often comes up of how Snaps and Flatpaks influence copyleft, GPL and LGPL licenses. It is a common misconception that these new packaging formats significantly influence license compliance. Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer, this is not legal advice. Distributing your software in a Snap has no effect on GPL copyleft and LGPL compliance #Copyleft Licenses. A type of license that tries to ensure the freedom to use, change and distribute works & derivatives. Not all copyleft licenses are compatible. GNU General Public License v3 (GPL-3) (396289) Code License managed by kevin. GNU Lesser General Public License v3 (LGPL-3.0) (210326) Code License managed by kevin. GNU General Public License v2.0 (GPL-2.0) (185123) Code License. As used herein, this License refers to version 3 of the GNU Lesser General Public License, and the GNU GPL refers to version 3 of the GNU General Public License. The Library refers to a covered work governed by this License, other than an Application or a Combined Work as defined below. An Application is any work that makes use of an interface provided by the Library, but which is not. This license, commonly known as the GPL, has two versions that are actively and widely used in many open source communities: GNU General Public License, version 2 (SPDX short identifier: GPL-2.0); GNU General Public License, version 3 (SPDX short identifier: GPL-3.0); If you have licensed software you've written under GPL version 2, and you are the original licensor of that software, you may.

Copyleft-Lizenzen: Fontana arbeitet an GPLv3-Nachfolger

cBioPortal Webinar Slides (2/3)

GNU General Public License - Wikipedi

GPL v3 stipulates that any such 'favours' must be extended to the entire community, undermining their effectiveness as a tool to realise business advantage through threat of litigation. The FSF, however, chose not to include the Affero clause in GPLv3, due to what it called irreconcilable views from different parts of the community. Many commercial users of Free Software were opposed. GPL stands for General Public License. LGPL is like an amended version of GPL. It stands for Lesser General Public License. It limits your requirement to provide some of your code, but you still are required to divulge the modifications that you implement. What you are permitted to keep private is the proprietary material that you directly link to the software. This allows you change the. With traditional GPL, copyleft was associated with the concept of distribution of software. The problem is that nowadays, distribution of software is rare: things tend to run in the cloud. AGPL fixes this loophole in GPL by saying that if you use the software over a network, you are bound by the copyleft. Other than that, the license is virtually the same as GPL v3. To say this another. If a GPL'd program can be enhanced with proprietary code, however packaged or however written, then the intentions of the developers to protect users' rights will be frustrated. The why of copyleft, then, is to protect all downstream users' freedoms by prohibiting proprietary enhancement. As the Preamble of GPLv3 puts it Bytecode Viewer. An advanced yet user friendly Java Reverse Engineering suite Used by 122,378 people world wide! Free & Open Sourced by Konloc

Nutzungsrechte an Freier Software (Open-Source

Full name. GNU General Public License v3.0 w/GCC Runtime Library exception. Short identifier. GPL-3.-with-GCC-exception. Other web pages for this licens Gegenüberstellung GNU AGPL v3.0 vs. Eclipse Public License - Erkenne die Unterschiede dank hilfreicher Visualisierungen auf einen Blick - Kategorie: Lizenz - Spalten: 2 (max. 3) - Zeilen: 1 Allerdings wird künftig natürlich zwei bedeutende Copyleft-Lizenzen geben - die GPL v2 und die GPL v3 - zwischen denen kein Code-Austausch möglichst ist, sofern nicht die or any later version-Klausel genutzt wurde. Ob sich das in der Praxis als Problem erweist, bleibt abzuwarten

CREALITY CR-10S GPL SOURCE CODE? @CREALITY3DWhy has GPL license usage dropped dramatically

GPL v3: Die Quelle muss offengelegt werden, wenn das Produkt veröffentlicht wird; Nutzer müssen die die Möglichkeit haben, den Code in einem User Product zu verändern. BSD oder MIT: Bei Nutzung muss ein Verweis auf die Bibliothek erfolgen und beibehalten werden. GPL v2: Die Quelle muss offengelegt werden, wenn das Produkt veröffentlicht. Life simply isn't black and white and when even Torvalds won't use GPL V3 because its too restrictive that should let you know RMS simply went too far. While i like the idea of FOSS and use it quite often i also know that companies have to make money and developers need to eat But it seems that RMS doesn't feel the same. Of course he is a self proclaimed squatter at MIT so he doesn't really.

Ende Juli 2006 hat die Free Software Foundation (FSF) einen zweiten Entwurf der GNU General Public Licence v3 (GPL) vorgelegt. Auch die Lesser General Public Licence (LGPL) wurde. The Free Software Foundation considers the Apache License, Version 2.0 to be a free software license, compatible with version 3 of the GPL.The Software Freedom Law Center provides practical advice for developers about including permissively licensed source. Apache 2 software can therefore be included in GPLv3 projects, because the GPLv3 license accepts our software into GPLv3 works The copyleft ensures that the modified versions are under the GPL and its source code is disclosed. The GPL is the template for all succeeding GPL versions (the GPLV2 and GPLV3). The GPLV2 is the predecessor of the GPLV3 which makes the GPLV3 the newest version. The GPLV2 was introduced in 1991 while the GPLV3 was launched in 2007

When a person or company wants to use a project licensed under—for example—GPL v3, Apache 2.0, or CC0 (more on these licenses later), it's relatively easy to figure out whether the license in. Trolltech was involved in talks with the Free Software Foundation (FSF) when the GPL v3 was created, and we added this license as an optional license for Qt after it was published by the FSF. Finally, in 2009 Nokia added LGPL v2.1 as a licensing option to Qt. The spirit of all GNU licenses is about a strong copyleft, giving users rather strong access and rights to the source code of. Thanks @Noel Boss ! Am I the only one with this mystical box shadow The scope of the activities triggering copyleft is comparable as those triggering the GNU GPL v3. Copyleft obligation is activated by any thinkable activity including public, ranging from performing the work in the park to sharing it on a P2P network. Conclusion As demonstrated above, copyleft obligations can be put into effect by various means. The triggers can differ.

Wie unterscheiden sich die GPLv2 und die GPLv3? ifrOS

Was sind die Gründe für die Open Source-Lizenzen GPL v2 und GPL v3? Erläuterungen und Verweise auf rechtliche Begriffe und weitere Beschreibungen sind willkommen. Der Grund für die v3-Lizenz war (nicht ganz) zynisch der Patentvertrag von Microsoft mit Novell. In der Praxis sollten Sie bei Rechtsfragen immer einen Anwalt konsultieren. Die mit einer anderen Antwort verknüpfte Seite ist eine. Die GPL v3 -Copyleft-Effekt (1) 6. Conveying Non-Source Forms. You may convey a covered work in object code form under the terms of sections 4 and 5, provided that you also convey the machine-readable Corresponding Source under the terms of this License, in one of these ways: [] 0. Definitions A covered work means either the unmodified Program or a work based on the Program. To. The GNU General Public License is a free, copyleft license for software and other kinds of works. The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed to take away your freedom to share and change the works. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change all versions of a. Der Copyleft-Effekt besteht darin, dass der proprietäre Code offen zu legen ist. In der GPL v3 wird zwischen dem covered work und dem Aggregate unterschieden. Eine covered work ist ein Werk, dass voll unter die Lizenz fällt. Die GPL v3 ist nicht nur auf das ursprüngliche Programm, sondern auch auf die Bearbeitung anzuwenden. Der proprietäre Code ist offen zu legen. Das Aggregate besteht.

Top 10 GNU GPL License Questions Answered WhiteSourc

But if you go with GPL V3 you can say goodbye to most of the appstores and you can say goodbye to most corporations wanting to buy from you, GPL V3 simply isn't in their best interests. Heck look at Google, the darling of the FOSS world, and even THEY won't allow any GPL V3 code to touch Android or ChromeOS! You are seeing this backlash because RMS hates corporations and put as many blocks. The GNU General Public License is a free, copyleft open source license for software and other kinds of works. This is in contrast to permissive licenses like BSD, which impose minimal restrictions on the redistribution of covered software. The GPL ensures that granted freedoms are preserved whenever the work is distributed, even when the work is changed or added to The ``share and share alike'' or ``copyleft'' aspect of the GPL is its most important functional characteristic, and those who want to use a copyleft license for software overwhelmingly use the GPL rather than inventing their own. Updating the GPL is therefore a very different task in 2005 than it was in 1991. The substantive reasons for revision, and the likely nature of those changes, are. As used herein, this License refers to version 3 of the GNU Lesser General Public License, and the GNU GPL refers to version 3 of the GNU General Public License. The Library refers to a covered work governed by this License, other than an Application or a Combined Work as defined below. An Application is any work that makes use of an interface provided by the Library. I believe I made it very clear in my article that I am an active supporter of copyleft and the GPL. Sure, some people may only read the headline, but if they are not going to invest the time in reading and understanding the piece, I am not going to invest my time in entertaining their perspectives. The most important point, I think, is that it's not about the orgs you mention (one of which I.

Copyleft and the GNU General Public License: A

  1. g language just to get a general idea of how to do something, and then write a different implementation of a similar or identical algorithm in the language I'm using, what would likely be the consequences? Would the copyleft owners have any legitimate complaints if my code was somewhat similar to, and clearly influenced by.
  2. 8) Copy and Share. Copy the text with right click -> copy over the text selected. Now, you can save with the Notepad to your HardDrive or share in forums, webpages, internet, emails, etc
  3. More on GPL v3. I have been looking in more detail at GPL v3 and also reading some comments in mailing lists, and I am starting to become deeply troubled by the new version of the world's most popular copyleft licence. In the good old version 2, the viral aspects of the GPL only apply to derivative works that are distributed to the public. In other words, you take a work under GPL, change it.
  4. • Ausblick: Copyleft in der GPL v3 (Ziff. 5 der 2nd draft von Juli `07)-To the extent that identifiable sections of the modified work, added by you, are not derived from the Program, and can be reasonably considered independent and separate works in themselves, then this License, and its terms, do not apply to those sections when you convey them as separate works, not specifically for use in.
  5. ation provision in v2 extremely aggressive. GPLv3 has friendlier.

GNU Affero General Public License - Wikipedi

Gegenüberstellung Eclipse Public License vs. GNU AGPL v3.0 - Erkenne die Unterschiede dank hilfreicher Visualisierungen auf einen Blick - Kategorie: Lizenz - Spalten: 2 (max. 3) - Zeilen: 1 Um die Entwickler und Autoren zu schützen, stellt die GPL darüberhinaus klar, daß für diese freie Software keinerlei Garantie besteht. Um sowohl der Anwender als auch der Autoren Willen erfordert die GPL, daß modifizierte Versionen der Software als solche gekennzeichnet werden, damit Probleme mit der modifizierten Software nicht fälschlicherweise mit den Autoren der Originalversion in. Copyleft adoption has changed significantly over time, for better and for worse. This talk will survey the many factors that drive adoption, with particular focus on GPL v2 and Affero GPL v3. While some factors are obvious and reasonably well-understood (particularly the shift towards SaaS economics) many other nuanced factors play in as well GPL v3 License. The GPL v3 License is a strong copyleft license. When building QGC under this license the open source version of Qt can be used. Our licensing grants the permission to use a later version of the license, however, contributions have to be made under 3.0. Documentation, Artwork, Image Die GPL (besonders v.3) ist unter Programmierern zunehmend unbeliebt, weil sie ihre Arbeit z.T. arg einschränkt. Besonders der zunehmende Versuch, jeder Verlinkung an propietäre oder unter anderen offenen Lizenzen stehende Libraries oder Treiber zu unterbinden, mag ja aus Sicht der Copyleft-Puristen Sinn ergeben, macht aber für den Programmierer die Arbeit in der Praxis schwerer

So ganz ist mir das Copyleft-Prinzip der GNU GPL noch nicht klar geworden. Ich habe es so verstanden, dass ich, wenn ich den Quellcode einer Software ändere, das Produkt wieder unter GNU GPL stellen muss. In meinem Fall will ich aber nicht den Quellcode ändern, sondern die unveränderte Software in einen skriptgesteuerten Arbeitsablauf einbinden. Greift dann schon das Copyleft-Prinzip, oder. The GNU GPL is the most widely used free software license and has a strong copyleft requirement. When distributing derived works, the source code of the work must be made available under the same license. There are multiple variants of the GNU GPL, each with different requirements. Home / Licenses; GNU General Public License v2.0. GNU GPLv2 The GNU GPL is the most widely used free software. Open-Source-Lizenzen Urheberrecht Urheberrecht an Software x69c Nr. 1 UrhG Der Rechtsinhaber hat das ausschlieˇliche Recht, [...] die dauerhafte oder vor ubergehende Vervielf altigung Only if the code is GPLv3. V2 code is subject to this problem, but V3 isn't (see TiVoization). Of course, why don't we just call GPL violations by what it really is? It's piracy, plain and simple. Or copyright infringement, if you like that term better

GPL Code: Was zählt als abgeleitete Arbeit? Ich arbeite an einem Open-Source-Projekt, das ich unter einer permissiven Lizenz veröffentlichen möchte, weil es eine Bibliothek ist, keine Anwendung und persönlich mag ich Copyleft nicht für Bibli The GNU Lesser General Public License v2.1 (LGPL v2.1 for short) is a variation of the regular GNU General Public License (GPL). Originally known as the GNU Library General Public License, it was drafted by the Free Software Foundation (FSF) to provide a weaker (or Lesser) form of copyleft for use in certain specific circumstances

GNU Affero General Public License - Wikipedia, laLICENCIA GPL / GNUTarkvara- ja sisulitsentsid 14

Sie zeichnet sich gegenüber der GPL durch eine abgeschwächte Copyleft-Regelung aus, die ermöglichen soll, dass unter der GPL stehende Bibliotheken mit proprietärer Software kombiniert und gemeinsam vertrieben werden können. Der Entwurf für eine LGPL 3 wurde vor allem in sprachlicher Hinsicht überarbeitet. Der Text verweist nunmehr in wesentlichen Teilen auf die GPL, wodurch die LGPL. > This clause is a permission to link; > therefore, as I read it, the GPLv3 copyleft weakens to an LGPL-style > copyleft in the case of linking with the Affero GPL. Each bit of code > remains under its own license. Yes, and I dislike it: it sounds as (and probably actually is...) an endorsement of the AfferoGPL v2 by the FSF. I don't want to open the can of worms of the FSF legal theory of. There is a Wikipedia has an article on tivoization, and here is a tutorial guide on copyleft and the GPL v2 and v3. There's also a question on Stackoverflow that has some useful info, although it was closed as off-topic. From answerer Will M: The page linked to in another answer is a good source, but a lot to read // @license http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html GNU GPL v3 or later // // Moodle is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify // it under the terms of the. In contrast, the GPL is a 'copyleft' license. This is a much more complicated idea. To begin to understand it, it helps to know that the GPL is written and maintained by the Free Software Foundation (whose website is unexpectedly ugly). The FSF is an organisation started by Richard Stallman, who is notoriously wacky (I mean it, take a look at his Wikiquote page sometime) when it comes to.

  • Rechtsextreme parteien in deutschland.
  • Altes testament judentum christentum islam.
  • Englisch mann lied.
  • Busch jäger bewegungsmelder für led.
  • Tsa daten lufthansa.
  • Keswick hotel.
  • Dsl anschlussarten.
  • Steinbock frau eigenschaften.
  • Kununu leipzig.
  • Fisher price bärchen gute nacht spieluhr.
  • Wann brüten krähen.
  • Indien punkt auf der stirn männer.
  • Englischsprachige reiseziele.
  • Thx bedeutung sms.
  • Breslau interessante orte.
  • Speed dating lille avis.
  • Kettenbefristung groko.
  • Wahlrecht weltweit.
  • Waschmaschinenanschluss.
  • Black panther deutschland.
  • Gekochte karotten blähungen.
  • Mein freund hat mir einen ring geschenkt.
  • Europa spiel unterricht.
  • Air crash.
  • Männer verstehen für dummies.
  • Mein lächeln ist hässlich.
  • Ni tu ni yo translation.
  • Palm springs hotels.
  • Bianchi aria gewicht.
  • Fließtext deutsch.
  • Youtube patti smith gloria.
  • Wm 2010 halbfinale.
  • Gif liebesbotschaften.
  • Skurrile geschenke.
  • Asperger beratungsstelle.
  • Photo femme voilée moderne.
  • Youtube beri nl.
  • Hiv bland unga i sverige.
  • Schüleraustausch irland privat.
  • Hausverwaltung potsdam babelsberg.
  • Sat anlage 8 teilnehmer test.